<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechieWire.com &#187; osx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techiewire.com/tag/osx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techiewire.com</link>
	<description>Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:57:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft+Mac = Messaging Hell&#8230; Alternatives?</title>
		<link>http://techiewire.com/2009/08/05/microsoftmac-messaging-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://techiewire.com/2009/08/05/microsoftmac-messaging-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 08:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custom emoticons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customizable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messenger for mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[native]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webcam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows live messenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techiewire.com/blog/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually, mixing Microsoft&#8217;s and OS X&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t turn out well. Lets take a few examples; iTunes and Safari beautifully on OS X but unfortunately leaves a lot to be desired back on Windows, Microsoft Office runs beautifully averagely on Windows but unfortunately leaves a lot to be desired on OS X. The pattern doesn&#8217;t stop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually, mixing Microsoft&#8217;s and OS X&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t turn out well. Lets take a few examples; iTunes and Safari beautifully on OS X but unfortunately leaves a lot to be desired back on Windows, Microsoft Office runs <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">beautifully</span> averagely on Windows but unfortunately leaves <strong>a lot </strong>to be desired on OS X. The pattern doesn&#8217;t stop there and well&#8230; as you&#8217;d expect&#8230; Windows Live Messenger runs pretty well on Windows (if not a little cluttered) but leaves a lot to be desired on OS X.</p>
<p>First up, heres my advice to you, use iChat if you can.It runs beautifully on the Mac, looks beautiful on the Mac and just fits in. If this really isn&#8217;t an option, e.g. if your in a position such as mine where everyone uses Windows Live Messenger, then the solutions are going to be a lil&#8217; bit uglier.</p>
<p>So lets take a look at Microsoft&#8217;s Port of Windows Live Messenger to Mac, dubbed <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/messenger/default.mspx" target="_blank">Messenger for Mac</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_154" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-154 " title="image_1" src="http://techiewire.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/image_11-300x243.png" alt="Messenger for Mac" width="300" height="243" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Messenger for Mac</p></div>
<p>So have a look at that&#8230; yeah&#8230; now keep that image in your head while you click the link to read on.</p>
<p><span id="more-147"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_153" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-153 " title="image_2" src="http://techiewire.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/image_21-300x243.png" alt="Windows Live Messenger" width="300" height="243" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Windows Live Messenger</p></div>
<p>Now look at this one. Remember the last image? See any similarities? Good because I don&#8217;t either. Consistency doesn&#8217;t seem to be a big deal over at Microsoft, and you can certainly tell that when you compare the two Messengers together. In fact, the only similarity that I can spot in the two versions is the fact that they actually both have a login screen. Now this would be okay if Messenger for Mac looked good, but in my personal opinion, compared to <a href="http://adium.im/" target="_blank">Adium</a> it just doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Even the feature list is different in the Mac version, in favor of Windows Live Messenger. In Messenger for Mac, you can send messages to people, send files, use custom emoticons, set your personal message as your currently playing iTunes song and&#8230; well that&#8217;s about it. Now let&#8217;s be all negative and look at what it can&#8217;t do-</p>
<ul style="line-height: 1.5em; list-style-type: square; margin-top: 0.3em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; list-style-image: url(http://en.wikipedia.org/skins-1.5/monobook/bullet.gif); padding: 0px;">
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Offline Messages</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Handwritten messages</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Screen sharing</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Nudges</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Winks</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Photo backgrounds on current conversation windows</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Games that can be played with another contact</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Some built-in emoticons, including the rabbit emoticon</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Contact details such as Addresses</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Integration with Windows Live Spaces</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Windows Live Today</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Color schemes</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Audio and Video chat for Personal accounts (this will be featured later in the 8.x series)</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;">Emoticons viewable on messenger nicks</li>
</ul>
<p>(referenced from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Messenger_for_Mac#cite_note-1" target="_blank">Wikipedia.org</a>)</p>
<p>Quite a big list isn&#8217;t it? So by now it&#8217;s pretty obvious that Messenger for Mac isn&#8217;t the best solution for messaging using the MSN network. So lets take a look at the competitors. First up, Mercury.</p>
<div id="attachment_157" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 247px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-157" title="image_6" src="http://techiewire.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/image_61-237x300.png" alt="Mercury Contact List" width="237" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Mercury Contact List</p></div>
<p>Mercury Messenger has pretty much got all of the &#8216;useful&#8217; features of Windows Live Messenger, plus a few other goodies. These include Custom Emoticons, Offline Instant Messaging, Winks, Nudges and Voice Clips, all of which are features that Messenger for Mac doesn&#8217;t have. In addition, I think the actual application is not a complete eye sore, excluding the logo, and Mercury also includes multiple skins. Furthermore, Mercury has a few features that you can&#8217;t even get on Windows Live Messenger, without installing <a href="www.msgplus.net" target="_blank">Msg Plus! Live</a>, such as Tabbed Chatting, Growl Support (lets you view notifications), add-ons, multiple connections at once and even Messenger Plus! Live colours.</p>
<p>The only draw back I can find about Mercury is also an advantage. It is written in Java. This means it has various ports over various operating systems but with the disadvantage of requiring a lot of CPU power and memory in certain situations. Secondly, we come to Adium&#8230;</p>
<div id="attachment_161" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 260px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-161" title="image_4" src="http://techiewire.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/image_42-250x300.png" alt="Adium Contact List" width="250" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Adium Contact List</p></div>
<p>Adium is lacking in features on the MSN IM Network, such as webcam, voice messages, custom emoticons etc., but what it does have going for it is that its completely native to Mac, meaning good performance, and its completely customizable. There are hundreds of skins you can use on Adium to make it match the style of your Mac and blend in perfectly, unlike Mercury which has rudimentary skins and Messenger for Mac which you can&#8217;t do anything to whatsoever. I&#8217;ve noticed a few crashes with Adium, but ultimately these can be overlooked and are sure to be ironed out in future releases.</p>
<p>If you simply cannot live without the fully fledged Windows Live Messenger, you can always use virtualization software (such as Parallels or VMWare Fusion) but I would use this as a last resort as it&#8217;s expensive and slows down your workflow because it uses a lot of system resources.</p>
<p>To conclude, choose Mercury if you require features, Adium for speed and appearance and Messenger for Mac if your crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techiewire.com/2009/08/05/microsoftmac-messaging-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Desktop Background&#8230; That Moves !</title>
		<link>http://techiewire.com/2009/08/04/a-desktop-background-that-moves/</link>
		<comments>http://techiewire.com/2009/08/04/a-desktop-background-that-moves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deskscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreamscene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screensaver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techiewire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wallpaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wallsaver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techiewire.com/blog/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone here remember Dreamscene? It was apart of the &#8216;Windows Vista Ultimate Extras&#8217;, a long winded name for the extra bits and bobs you get for forking out an extra $60 for Windows Vista Ultimate (compared to Windows Vista Home Premium). For anyone doesn&#8217;t, it was basically an extra which allowed you to use a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone here remember Dreamscene? It was apart of the &#8216;Windows Vista Ultimate Extras&#8217;, a long winded name for the extra bits and bobs you get for forking out an extra $60 for Windows Vista Ultimate (compared to Windows Vista Home Premium). For anyone doesn&#8217;t, it was basically an extra which allowed you to use a video as your desktop background as opposed to a still image; a pointless feature, but nonetheless at least it looks good and impresses the kids.</p>
<p>Now if you&#8217;ve upgraded to Windows 7 or your using a Mac and missing this feature, do not worry, as there are solutions for both to make your Desktop pretty again (and no it&#8217;s not Deskscapes which is just a rip off). Video and tutorials after the break&#8230;<span id="more-126"></span><p><a href="http://techiewire.com/2009/08/04/a-desktop-background-that-moves/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<p>Vista showin&#8217; off all its fancy stuff there eh? So lets start with us Mac users, what we gonna do?</p>
<p>Well there&#8217;s this little app I&#8217;ve found called <a href="http://www.wallsaverapp.com/" target="_blank">Wallsaver</a>. Despite a recommendation against Wallsaver, I have found this application to give the best results. There is a catch though, but I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll overlook this when faced with the prettiness it brings to your desktop.</p>
<p>So go and head over to <a href="http://www.wallsaverapp.com/" target="_blank">WallSaverApp.com</a>. When you visit the homepage you might be thinking&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Well hang on&#8230; this sets a screen saver as your desktop background not a video!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Well a screen saver is a video. It&#8217;s an animated image which, for the most part, is rendered in realtime. Mac OSX comes preloaded with some gorgeous screen savers and you can even download more from the web. Who wouldn&#8217;t want to exploit that?</p>
<div id="attachment_134" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-134" title="image_1" src="http://techiewire.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/image_1-300x229.png" alt="Wallsaver Application" width="300" height="229" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Wallsaver Application</p></div>
<p>So lets get back to business, get wall saver download and installed onto your system and go ahead and open her up. If your a bit eager, go ahead and click activate now. This should turn the desktop backgrounds of all your monitors to the default screen saver. Once your done drooling at the screen, your probably thinking to yourself&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Duuude, I want this thang as my background all the time!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_135" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-135" title="image_2" src="http://techiewire.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/image_2-300x245.jpg" alt="Account Preferences" width="300" height="245" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Account Preferences</p></div>
<p>That you should, and it&#8217;s a pretty simple thing to do to. First of all, click on the Preferences tab of Wallsaver and check all the the tick boxes, and while your there choose your screen saver. Next, go into your system preferences and click on &#8216;Accounts&#8217;. From here click on &#8216;Logic Items&#8217;, add Wallsaver by click on the plus icon and finding it in your applications folder and add it on in.</p>
<div id="attachment_136" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-136" title="image_3" src="http://techiewire.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/image_31-300x235.png" alt="Finding Wallsaver" width="300" height="235" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Finding Wallsaver</p></div>
<p>This will ensure that Wallsaver is opened up and changes your background automatically every time you start up your Mac.</p>
<div id="attachment_137" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-137" title="image_4" src="http://techiewire.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/image_41-300x187.png" alt="Wallsaver In Action" width="300" height="187" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Wallsaver In Action</p></div>
<p>Well what about you Windows 7 users? Where did dreamscene go!? Well MyDigitalLife.info has a nice <a href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/01/14/how-to-install-and-enable-dreamscene-in-windows-7/" target="_blank">tutorial </a> on how to use DreamScene on Windows 7, regardless of the version you have. What&#8217;s the best thing about these apps I hear you ask? They&#8217;re completely free. I mean&#8230; you could use DeskScapes but&#8230; Stardock just suck, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techiewire.com/2009/08/04/a-desktop-background-that-moves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
